KisStartup – Compilation & Analysis
The most important question in travel tech is not “what app to build,” but “where the money really comes from, what value is being created, and who is paying for it.” Behind sleek interfaces, smooth maps, and personalized journeys lies a complex revenue system in which booking is only the visible surface. This article breaks down the real revenue streams of global travel tech, with concrete examples, and draws strategic implications for Vietnamese travel tech in the context of data-driven, sustainable, and inclusive tourism development.
1. Commission & Transaction Fees: The “Classic” Revenue Stream—No Longer Enough
Travel tech’s history is closely tied to commissions. Booking.com, Agoda, Expedia, and Trip.com all started by taking a percentage of hotel bookings, flights, tours, or add-on services. For independent hotels, a 15–25% commission is often seen as a “marketing cost.” For OTAs, this model was simple, scalable, and effective during market growth.
However, commissions are no longer a safe backbone. Margins are squeezed by fierce competition and rising marketing costs—Booking.com has spent billions of USD annually on Google Ads to maintain traffic. Service providers increasingly push customers toward direct channels to reduce OTA dependence. During crises (COVID-19, tourism downturns), booking-based models can freeze instantly.
As a result, for mature travel tech companies, commissions are now just one revenue layer—not the sole foundation.
2. Service Fees & “Small but Many” Charges: More Stable Cash Flow
A less visible but highly effective revenue stream is service fees: processing fees, change fees, refund fees, convenience fees, insurance, price-hold fees, and more. Individually small, these fees generate steady income and are less dependent on booking value.
For example, many OTAs charge higher change or refund fees than their actual costs. Hopper doesn’t necessarily sell cheaper tickets, but earns heavily from products like price freeze, cancel-for-any-reason, or flight delay guarantees. Here, travel tech is not selling flights—it’s selling risk reduction and peace of mind.
Service fees often have higher margins than commissions because the value lies in algorithms, probability data, and financial product design—not in travel inventory.
3. Subscription & SaaS: Where Revenue Becomes Predictable and Durable
A major shift in travel tech is the move toward subscription models, especially in B2B.
In B2C, platforms like eDreams Prime or Trip.com Subscription charge annual membership fees in exchange for discounts, faster point accumulation, or exclusive deals. Subscription revenue reduces dependence on one-off bookings and increases customer loyalty.
In B2B, SaaS is the real long-term goldmine. Platforms like TravelPerk or Navan don’t rely on booking commissions but on subscription fees from companies using their travel, expense, and compliance management systems. Whether bookings happen or not, clients pay monthly because the value lies in control, data, and decision-making.
At its core, travel tech is no longer selling trips—it’s selling operational capability.
4. Sponsored Listings & Priority Display: Selling “Decision Positions”
A large but often overlooked revenue source is sponsored listings. On Booking.com or Airbnb, search results are not purely organic. Hotels, tours, or experiences can pay extra to appear in more prominent positions, especially for high-value searches.
This turns travel tech into an attention broker rather than a neutral intermediary. In many cases, revenue from sponsored placement can exceed commissions, as suppliers are willing to pay for positions that directly influence customer decisions.
For discovery or planning apps with high traffic but low booking conversion, advertising and sponsored listings often become the primary revenue stream.
5. Data & Insights: Hidden Revenue with High Margins
One of the most important modern travel tech revenue streams lies in data—largely invisible to end users.
Platforms that own search data, price comparisons, mobility patterns, length of stay, and willingness-to-pay can sell reports, dashboards, and demand forecasts to airlines, hotel chains, destinations, or policymakers. The data is anonymized, aggregated, and compliant—but economically extremely valuable.
Skyscanner, Google Travel, and Amadeus earn not only from consumers, but also from selling insights and data infrastructure to industry players. This is why many travel tech firms accept lower short-term B2C revenue to build large-scale datasets for B2B monetization.
6. APIs & Infrastructure: Travel Tech as the “Factory Behind the Scenes”
Another under-discussed layer is API monetization. Instead of building consumer apps, many travel tech companies sell flight search, hotel availability, dynamic pricing, or loyalty engines to other platforms.
Amadeus, Sabre, and API-first startups charge per API call, usage tiers, or revenue share. Each integrated website, app, bank, or telco becomes an indirect sales channel.
In this model, strong consumer branding is less important than reliability, scalability, and deep integration—advantages that are very hard to replicate.
7. Post-Booking & Back-Office Operations: Money After the Trip Is Booked
A very “practical” revenue source is post-booking monetization. After a booking is made, the probability of upselling—changes, upgrades, insurance, or add-ons—remains high if timed correctly.
Some travel tech companies specialize in recovering lost value: unused tickets, unclaimed refunds, or commission discrepancies for agencies. They charge a fee based on recovered value, with minimal risk.
Here, travel tech makes money from operational optimization, not from romantic travel experiences.
8. White-Label & “Powered By”: Selling Technology Instead of Customers
Many travel tech companies don’t build consumer brands at all. Instead, they offer white-label solutions to banks, insurers, telcos, or large corporations that want travel services within their ecosystems. Revenue comes from setup fees, annual licenses, and revenue sharing.
For example, a bank may offer a “VIP travel booking app,” while the search, pricing, and booking engine is fully operated by a travel tech provider behind the scenes.
9. What Should Vietnamese Travel Tech Learn from This?
From KisStartup’s perspective, the key lesson is clear: booking is just a touchpoint, not a complete business model. Vietnamese travel tech companies that rely solely on commissions will struggle to compete sustainably against global platforms.
Real opportunities lie in SaaS for small and medium tourism businesses, destination data, operational tools for community-based tourism, local ecosystem APIs, and back-office revenue streams aligned with sustainable tourism.
As Vietnam pursues green tourism, visitor dispersion, and higher-value experiences, successful travel tech companies will be those that earn money by helping others make better decisions—not merely by selling one more booking.
That is where business models, data, and digital transformation truly intersect—and where Vietnamese travel tech can build a distinctive advantage, if it starts with the right question: What value are we creating, for whom, and who is willing to pay for it?
© KisStartup. All rights reserved. Any reproduction or reuse must clearly credit KisStartup.